SAMHSA's National Mental Health Information Center

This Web site is a component of the SAMHSA Health Information Network

  | | |      
Search
In This Section

Online Publications

Order Publications

National Library of Medicine

National Academies Press

Publications Homepage

Page Options
printer icon printer friendly page

e-mail icon e-mail this page

bookmark icon bookmark this page

shopping cart icon shopping cart

account icon  current or new account

This Web site is a component of the SAMHSA Health Information Network.


skip navigation

2000 Annual Report to Congress on the Evaluation
of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health
Services for Children and Their Families Program

Back to Report

DATA HIGHLIGHTS

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

Child Characteristics

  • Gender: 62% boys, 38% girls.
  • Average Age: 12.1 years.
  • Race/Ethnicity: 53% White, 24% Hispanic, 14% African-American, 2% American Indian or Alaskan Native, 3% Asian American or Pacific Islander, and 4% other ethnicities.

Family Characteristics

  • Family Composition: At intake, 47% of the children lived with their biological mother only, 26% lived in two-parent homes, 5% lived with their father only, 8% lived with a guardian,10% were wards of the State, and 4% had other living situations.
  • Living Arrangements: Among all children with data at intake, 58% of children were reported to have lived in just one living arrangement during the previous 12 months; 42% were reported to have lived in two or more different living arrangements.

Risk Factors

  • Poverty: At intake, 68% of the children's families reported incomes below the poverty level of $17,050 for a family of four according to DHHS's 2000 Poverty Guidelines (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000).
  • Family Composition and Poverty: At intake, 76% of children in mother-maintained households lived in poverty, 60% of the children in father-maintained households lived in poverty, and 56% of the children in two-parent households lived in poverty.
  • Child Risk Factors: At intake, 67% of caregivers reported that their child had at least one child risk factor for serious emotional disturbance. The most frequently reported child risk factors included history of physical abuse (31%) history of running away (25%), previous psychiatric hospitalization (25%), and sexual abuse (23%), and drug or alcohol use (21%).
  • Family Risk Factors: At intake, 84% of caregivers identified at least one family risk factor, and 42% indicated three or more family risk factors. The most frequently reported family risk factors were history of substance abuse (62%), history of mental illness (46%), and history of family violence (53%).

Referral Sources

  • Referral Sources: 22% of the children were referred to systems of care by a mental health agency, 15% through juvenile justice agencies, 20% by schools, 14% by social service agencies, and 16% by caregivers or youth themselves.
  • Referral source differed significantly by ethnicity. More White families and fewer Hispanic families referred themselves to services, however minority families were no more likely to be referred to services from external sources (such as schools, mental health, juvenile justice, or social service agencies) than White children.

Diagnoses

  • Diagnosis: 29.4% of children had a DSM-IV diagnosis of conduct-related disorders, 25.8% of depression, 13.8% of ADHD, 7.9% of anxiety disorders, 6.3% of adjustment disorders, and 16.8% had a diagnosis of other disorders.

Educational Status

  • Individualized Education Plan (IEP): 48% of children had an IEP; 53% of the children with IEPs had IEPs related to the emotional or behavioral disturbance designation, 35% for challenges due to learning disabilities, and the remaining 12% had IEPs for physical disabilities and various other reasons. In addition, the majority of the children in special education classes had an IEP.

Juvenile Justice Status

  • Contacts with Youth Authorities: 62% of youth aged 11 years and older reported that they had been accused of breaking the law, 50% had one or more arrests, and 54% had been on probation.

Substance Use Status

  • Cigarette, Alcohol, Marijuana Use: Based on self-reports from youth aged 11 years or older, 58% of 345 youth had used alcohol, 67% had smoked cigarettes, and 50% had used marijuana prior to intake. Of youth who had used marijuana, 65% had used marijuana in the 30 days before entering services.

TO WHAT EXTENT DO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES' OUTCOMES IMPROVE OVER TIME?

Clinical Outcomes

  • Behavioral and Emotional Problems Were Reduced: After 2 years of receiving services, 46% of the children showed a significant reduction in severe behavioral and emotional problem symptoms as indicated by the total problem score on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). For 70% of these children, ratings of their problems fell below those that indicate a need for clinical care at 2 years.
  • Clinical Functioning Improved: After 2 years in services, children's social functioning improved significantly. Girls made slightly greater gains than boys in the first 6 months.
  • Behavioral and Emotional Strengths Improved: Six months after intake into the system-of-care programs, caregivers' ratings of children's strengths increased significantly in all areas except school functioning, which improved slightly. Children diagnosed with conduct-related disorders had the greatest increases in overall strengths scores after 6 months to above average strengths for children with behavioral and emotional disorders.

The child and family outcomes study examines how change occurs over time for a subsample of children and families enrolled in the descriptive study. Outcomes data are collected at intake and at subsequent intervals to assess change over time. Outcomes measures include, but are not limited to

  • behavioral, emotional, and social functioning;
  • educational performance;
  • involvement with the law;
  • stability of living arrangements; and
  • family and child satisfaction with services.

Instruments typically used in the field of children’s mental health, including the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS; Epstein & Sharma, 1998), the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1991), and the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS; Hodges, 1990), were used to collect these data.

Functional Outcomes

  • Residential Stability Improved: Overall, the stability of living arrangements increased among children in the system of care from intake to 2 years. The majority of children reported only one living arrangement in the year prior to intake (64%); however, there was a decrease from intake to 2 years in the percentage of children with multiple living arrangements.
  • School Attendance Improved Among Girls: Among girls who remained in services for 2 years, school attendance improved. Among boys, school attendance did not change.
  • School Performance Improved: After 2 years in services, the percentage of boys with average or above average grades increased from 59% at intake to 71%. The percentage of girls with average or above average grades increased from 63% at intake to 73% after 2 years in services.
  • Children with Individualized Education Plans (IEP) Increased: At intake into services, 41.7% children in the outcomes study did not have an IEP. The percentage of children who had an IEP increased from intake to 2 years. These statistics demonstrate an overall increase in the use of IEPs of 19% from intake to 2 years.
  • Law Enforcement Contacts Were Reduced: The percentage of children with law enforcement contacts decreased from 23.9% at intake into services to 18.6% after 2 years in services.

HOW ARE SERVICES DELIVERED IN SYSTEMS OF CARE?

  • Children and families received a broad array of services. Among grant communities funded in 1997 and 1998, children and families received an average of six services. Children received both traditional and nontraditional services.
  • System-of-care principles were implemented in infrastructure and service delivery. Across the eight system-of-care principles, grant communities tended to score higher in the service delivery domain than in the infrastructure domain.

Family Ratings of Services

  • Caregivers were satisfied with services. Nearly 70% of the caregivers indicated that they found services to be good or excellent after 2 years.
  • Caregivers were satisfied with their child's progress. Over 70% of the caregivers were satisfied or very satisfied with their child's progress after 2 years in services.
  • Caregivers reported having a choice in making service decisions. Over 75% of the caregivers reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their choice of services.
  • Caregivers reported being asked their opinions about their child's treatment. Nearly 70% of the caregivers indicated that they were usually or always asked for their ideas and opinions.
  • Caregivers received unconditional, high-quality care. Nearly 70% of the caregivers felt they would receive care unconditionally and believed that the quality of their care would be high.

Youth Rating of Services

  • Youth were satisfied with services. Nearly 70% of the youth rated services as "good or excellent" after 2 years in services.
  • Youth were satisfied with their progress. Nearly 70% of youth were satisfied or very satisfied with their progress after 2 years in services.
  • Some youth reported having a choice in making service decisions. Less than half of the youth reported having a choice in the services they received.
  • Some youth reported being asked their opinions about their treatment. Less than half of the youth reported that they were usually or always asked for their opinion or ideas.
  • Youth received unconditional, high-quality care. Nearly 70% of the youth felt they would receive care unconditionally and believed that the quality of their care would be high.

List of Grant Communities

REFERENCES

Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Epstein, M. H., & Sharma, J. (1998). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Friedman, R. M., Katz-Leavy, J. W., Manderscheid, R. W., & Sondheimer, D. L. (1999). Prevalence of serious emotional disturbance: An update. In R. W. Manderscheid & M. J. Henderson (Eds.), Mental health, United States, 1998 (pp. 110-112). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Hodges, K. (1990). Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). Ypsilanti, MI: Eastern Michigan University, Department of Psychology.

National Institute of Mental Health. (1969). Crisis in child mental health: Challenge for the 70's. Report of the Joint Commission on Mental Health of Children. Bethesda, MD: Author.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). The 2000 HHS Poverty Guidelines: One Version of the [U.S.] Federal Poverty Measure. Retrieved August 25, 2000, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/00poverty.htm


1Services required in the grant's guidance for applicants include diagnosis and evaluation; case management; outpatient individual, group, and family counseling; medication management; professional consultation; 24-hour emergency; intensive home-based; intensive day treatment; respite; therapeutic foster care; and transition-to-adult.

Home  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Awards  |  Accessibility  |  Privacy and Disclaimer Statement  |  Site Map
Go to Main Navigation United States Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration SAMHSA's HHS logo National Mental Health Information Center - Center for Mental Health Services