 |
This Web site is a component of the SAMHSA Health Information Network. |
 |
What You Need to Know About Youth Violence Prevention
Pathways to Violence: What Do We Know?
The most important conclusion of the U.S. Surgeon General's report is that youth violence is a solvable problem.
WHAT DOES THE RESEARCH TELL US ABOUT YOUTH VIOLENCE?
- The U.S. Surgeon General's report states that
the greatest need is for the Nation to
"confront the problem of youth violence
systematically, using research-based approaches,
and to correct damaging myths and stereotypes."
-
The search for solutions to the issue
of youth violence is challenging. Research
conducted for the U.S. Surgeon General’s
report using extremely high scientific
standards found that nearly half of the
most rigorously evaluated prevention strategies
did not achieve their intended outcomes.
Perhaps these programs did not work because
of a flawed program strategy—or
because of poor program implementation
or a poor match between program and target
population. The research also found that
a few strategies actually were harmful
to participants.
- Many
effective prevention and intervention
programs are now in place, however. We
have the tools and the understanding now
to reduce, or even prevent, much of the
most serious youth violence. We also have
the tools to reduce less dangerous (but
still serious) problem behaviors and to
promote healthy development among young
people.
Back to top
WHAT ARE THE MAJOR TRENDS IN YOUTH VIOLENCE?
- The
Surgeon General’s report states
that between 1983 and 1993, deadly violence
involving guns rose to epidemic proportions.
At the same time, the number of young
people involved in other forms of serious
violence rose slightly.
- Since
1994, however, gun use and homicide arrests
have dropped, and nonfatal serious violence
has gone down. By 1999, arrest rates for
violent crimes other than aggravated assault
had dropped below 1983 levels, but arrest
rates for aggravated assault remained almost
70 percent higher than in 1983.
- Despite
the current decline in gun use and lethal
violence, the proportion of young people
who report their involvement in nonfatal
violence remains as high as in the peak
years of the epidemic, as does the proportion
of students injured with a weapon at school.
The number of young people involved in
gangs remains near the peak levels of
1996.
- Young
men—especially those from minority
groups—are arrested disproportionately
for violent crimes. But self-reports show
that differences in violent behavior between
minority and majority groups and between
sexes may not be as great as arrest records
indicate. Race or ethnicity by itself
does not predict whether a child or adolescent
is likely to engage in violence.
- Schools
around the country are relatively safe
compared to homes and neighborhoods. Young
people at greatest risk of being killed
in school violence are from a racial or
ethnic minority, senior high schools,
and urban school districts.
Back to top
WHEN DOES YOUTH VIOLENCE BEGIN?
Scientists have described two patterns for engagement
in violence: early onset and late onset.
These patterns help to predict the likely
course, severity, and duration of violent
behaviors over a person’s lifespan.
In the early onset pattern, violence begins
before adolescence; in the late onset
pattern, violent behavior begins during
adolescence. According to the Surgeon
General’s report:
- Most
children with behavioral disorders do
not become serious violent offenders.
- Most
highly aggressive children do not become
serious violent offenders.
- Most
youth violence begins in adolescence but
doesn’t continue into adulthood.
- Young
people who become violent before age 13
usually commit more crimes, and more serious
crimes, for a longer time. Their pattern
of violence rises through childhood and
sometimes continues into adulthood.
Back to top
WHY DO YOUNG PEOPLE BECOME VIOLENT?
Research
on youth violence has identified certain
personal characteristics and environmental
conditions that place children and youth
at risk for engaging in violent behavior
or that seem to protect them from that risk.
These characteristics and conditions — risk
and protective factors, respectively — exist
not only within individuals but also in
every social setting in which they find
themselves: family, school, peer group,
and community.
Risk factors can identify
vulnerable populations that may benefit
from intervention efforts but not particular
individuals who may become violent. No single
risk factor or combination of factors can
predict violence with certainty. Similarly,
protective factors cannot guarantee that
a child exposed to risk will not become
violent.
More
research is necessary to identify risk and
protective factors, to determine when in
a person's development these factors come
into play, and to discover why violence
starts, continues, or stops in childhood
and adolescence. However, research to date
offers a solid basis for implementing programs
aimed at reducing risk factors and promoting
protective factors — and thereby preventing
violence.
Back to top
WHAT RISK FACTORS ARE CORRELATED WITH YOUTH VIOLENCE?
Risk factors for violence are different for
youth with the early onset pattern compared
to those with the late onset pattern. The
most powerful risk factors for children ages
6 to 11 who commit violence at ages 15 to18
are involvement in serious (but not necessarily
violent) criminal acts and substance abuse.
Table 1 identifies these and other known childhood
risk factors. The factors are ranked by the
strength of their influence, as determined
by statistical research undertaken for the
U.S. Surgeon General’s report.
TABLE 1
Early Risk Factors
for Those Who Commit Violence at Ages
15–18 |
| Strongest factors |
- Involvement in serious (but not necessarily violent) criminal acts
- Substance abuse
|
| Moderate factors |
- Male
gender
- Physical
aggression (males only)
- Low
family socioeconomic status or poverty
- Antisocial
(violent or criminal) parents
|
| Additional factors shown to play a limited role |
- Psychological
conditions, including hyperactivity
- Poor
parent-child relations, including
harsh, lax, or inconsistent dicipline
- Weak social ties
- Problem (antisocial) behavior
- Exposure to television violence
- Poor attitude toward or performance in
school
- Medical
or physical conditions
- Low
IQ
- Broken
home
- Dishonesty
- Abusive or neglectful parents
- Antisocial peers
|
| Source: Youth Violence: A Report of the
Surgeon General, p. 60. |
Mid- to late adolescence is a period of significant
developmental change and a time during which
peer influences outweigh family influence.
The strongest risk factors for adolescents
ages 12 to 14 who commit violence at ages
15 to 18 are identified in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Late Risk Factors
for Those Who Commit Violence at Ages
15–18 |
| Strongest factors |
- Weak
ties to conventional peers
- Ties
to antisocial or delinquent peers
- Gang membership
- Involvement
in other criminal acts
|
| Additional factors shown to play a limited role |
- Psychological
conditions, including restlessness,
difficulty concentrating (males
only), and risk taking
- Poor
parent-child relations, including
harsh or lax discipline, poor monitoring
or supervision, and low parental
involvement
- Aggression
(males only)
- Male
gender
- Poor
attitude toward or performance in
school
- Physical
violence
- Crime,
drugs, and disorganization in the neighborhood
- Antisocial
parents
- Antisocial
attitudes, beliefs
- Crimes
against persons
- Problem
(antisocial) behavior
- Low
IQ
- Broken
home
- Low
family socioeconomic status or poverty
- Abusive
parents
- Family
conflict (males only)
- Substance
abuse
|
| Source: Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General,
p. 60. |
An accumulation of risk factors is more important
in predicting violent behaviors than is
the presence of any single factor. The more
risk factors a child or young person is
exposed to, the greater the likelihood that
he or she will become violent.
Back to top
CAN OTHER FACTORS LEAD TO YOUTH VIOLENCE?
Some situations and conditions can influence
the likelihood of violence or the form it
takes. Situational factors - such as provoking,
taunting, and demeaning interactions - can
spark unplanned violence. The presence of
a gun in certain situations can raise the
level of violence.
The
Surgeon General’s Report found only
limited evidence indicating a relationship
between serious mental disorders and violence
in adolescents or young adults in the general
population, but young people with serious
mental disorders who also abuse substances
or have not received treatment may be at
risk for violence.
Back to top
WHAT FACTORS PROTECT AGAINST YOUTH VIOLENCE?
Protective factors - the personal characteristics and
environmental conditions that help protect
against a specific risk - provide some explanation
as to why children and adolescents who face
the same degree of risk may behave differently.
The
research evidence about factors that protect
against youth violence is not as extensive
as is the research on risk factors, and
the research must be considered preliminary.
Although a number of protective factors
have been proposed, only two have been found
to moderate the risk of violence: an intolerant
attitude toward deviance, including violence,
and commitment to school. These factors
reflect a commitment to traditional values.
Both effects are small.
Back to top
WHAT ROLE DO CULTURE, ETHNICITY, AND RACE PLAY IN YOUTH VIOLENCE?
Considered apart from other life circumstances, race
and ethnicity have not been shown to be risk
factors for youth violence.
- The evidence suggests that the link between
race and violence is based largely on
social and political differences rather
than on biological differences. Ethnicity
may account for limited opportunities
due to prejudice, and ethnic minority
families may face acculturation stresses.
On the other hand, some features of ethnic
cultures may serve as protective factors
(Surgeon General, 2001; APA 1993).
- Prevention
specialists generally presume that risk
factors for youth violence identified
in studies with primarily White participants
are relevant also for such culturally
diverse groups as African Americans, Hispanics,
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders,
and Native Americans. Research on the
roles that race, ethnicity, and culture
may play among young people of specific
minority groups is needed to shed light
on the risk and protective factors that
affect those groups.
Back to top
HOW DOES MEDIA VIOLENCE AFFECT YOUTH VIOLENCE?
In the context of the ongoing debate on the
effect of media violence on children and
youth, the U.S. Surgeon General’s
report summarizes major research findings
from the small body of research on the topic:
- Exposure
to media violence can increase children’s
aggressive behavior in the short term.
Media violence increases aggressive attitudes
and emotions, which theoretically are
linked to aggressive and violent behavior.
Evidence for long-term effects of media
violence is inconsistent.
- Violent
behaviors occur infrequently and are subject
to multiple influences. Existing evidence
is insufficient to describe accurately
how much exposure to media violence—of
what types, for how long, at what ages, for what types of children,
or in what types of home settings—will
predict violent behavior in adolescents
and adults.
Families play a critical role in guiding their children’s
exposure to the media, including television
programs, films and videos, and computer
and video games. Community groups—such
as schools, faith-based organizations, and
parent-teacher-student organizations—can
teach parents and children how to be more
critical consumers of media. In addition,
Federal agencies can encourage needed research,
share research findings with the public,
encourage increased interaction between
violence prevention researchers and media
researchers, and create networks for sharing
solutions to social and public health problems.
For a more detailed discussion of the risk
factors for youth violence, see Youth Violence:
A Report of the Surgeon General, chapter
4.
Back to top
Previous | TOC | Next
|
 |