![]() |
This Web site is a component of the SAMHSA Health Information Network |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||
|
This Web site is a component of the SAMHSA Health Information Network. |
Evaluation: Did You do it? Did it Matter?Articulating a Theory of ChangeEvaluators advise collaborations to articulate a theory of change to represent their beliefs about what children and their families need and what strategies will help meet those needs. Building Blocks of a Theory of Change Conceptualization and operationalization of the three core elements of a program
Understanding and expression of the relationship of the three core elements
Source: M. Hernandez. (2000). Using logic models and program theory to build outcome accountability. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 24–40. THERE ARE THREE INTERCONNECTED PARTS TO THE THEORY OF CHANGE. WHAT YOU SAY YOU WILL DO SHOULD RELATE TO WHAT YOU ARE TOLD BY STAKEHOLDERS AND STAFF AND TO WHAT YOU DISCOVER WHEN YOU GATHER DATA. THE THREE PARTS ARE:
Benefits derived from articulating a theory of change include the development of local solutions; the facilitation of communication and collaboration among partners; the improved ability of systems and programs to specify where they are going and how they plan to get there; and improved strategic planning, internal evaluation, and quality. (See Getting to Outcomes in ACTION Pamphlet 1.) Collaborators often are concerned because they embark on their violence prevention initiatives without expressing—or even thinking much about—a theory of change. It is helpful to backtrack at this point and seek guidance on how to do so; evaluators recommend searching the Internet, where a wealth of information on theories of change can be found. (Try a www.google.com search on the phrase “theories of change.”) Illustrate your collaboration’s theory of change in your logic model. |
| Home | Contact Us | About Us | Awards | Accessibility | Privacy and Disclaimer Statement | Site Map |